Comments on Evolved and Rational: Dembski: The failure that keeps on failing

clapclapclap

2008-06-24T13:40:00.000-04:00

*clap*clap*clap*

卐

2008-06-21T01:51:00.000-04:00

卐

shalini sehkar preaching to the nerd choir. wah wa...

2008-06-21T01:48:00.000-04:00

shalini sehkar preaching to the nerd choir. wah wah wah wah.

Yeah and I'm sure it made you feel good to post no...

2008-06-20T12:09:00.000-04:00

Yeah and I'm sure it made you feel good to post nothing of worth under the cover of Anonymous. blah blah blah

Yawn... I'm sure posting this made you and the pea...

2008-06-20T11:53:00.000-04:00

Yawn... I'm sure posting this made you and the peanut gallery feel good. But to everyone else, it's just the same old wah wah wah wah wah.

BillDumb is terribly wrong on so many counts that ...

2008-06-20T09:11:00.000-04:00

BillDumb is terribly wrong on so many counts that he has to be either batshit insane, cluelessly ignorant or a common lying-for-Jesus fraud.

You realise that those aren't mutually exclusive? Dembski is the living embodiment of all three of them

Christislord12 said:
When Darwinists cannot fight facts, they resort to mockery.

You seem to be missing the irony of using the word "Darwinist" in that sentence, but aside from that, we can't fight facts, because you don't have any of them. Your evidence is kinda like your god, it's impossible to oppose what doesn't exist.

Excellent post, although it does beg the question ...

2008-06-20T03:09:00.000-04:00

Excellent post, although it does beg the question as to which part of "Dembski is a dishonest scumbag" you weren't getting. ;-)

as far as evidence for recent creation I imagine m...

2008-06-20T01:50:00.000-04:00

as far as evidence for recent creation I imagine most of it would consist of a case against evolution. Although the problem for creationists seems to be that a lot of the positive evidence of special creation is put forward by the Intelligent Design movement.

However one interesting thing of note I found is Dembski's response to Kenneth Miller's dissection of Irreducible Complexity. I will give you the link;

http://www.theism.net/article/39

In the article I think Dembski was trying to say that he didn't think Kenneth Miller was very theistic for being a theistic evolutionist because he supports methodological naturalism, Dembski isn't as stupid as you make him to be but he does on occasion say stupid and dense things.

Since you are all about facts, where are the facts...

2008-06-20T00:59:00.000-04:00

Since you are all about facts, where are the facts that show special creation?

When Darwinists cannot fight facts, they resort to...

2008-06-20T00:40:00.000-04:00

When Darwinists cannot fight facts, they resort to mockery. Repent and find G-d before it is too late!

Thank reason we are back to creationist bashing. G...

2008-06-20T00:15:00.000-04:00

Thank reason we are back to creationist bashing. Great post.