Is this video pro-IDiot or pro-science?

4/02/2008 | 11:37 AM | Evolved Rationalist



I assumed that it was an attempt at satire by the IDiots, but somehow it is too good to be a creotard production. The inside jokes like the squid on PZ's hat make it more and more unlikely that the IDiots are behind it.

Here are the lyrics:

My name is D to the I to C to the K, Yeah I'm the Dickie D,
I gots my phd and comin' your way on the youtube to bust your world view
so just listen to me and don't you argue.

You see, this battle's been ragin' since Zeus was on the bottle,
between Science like Democritus and Faith like Aristotle,
who said the mover wasn't movin' like some magic trick but
that's no good logic, my posse is far too quick for this
religious sthick.

Cos science is the only way to know y'all,
you stand with me y'all,
or you can fall y'all so go ahead and take your pick.

ES: Yeah you tell him Rick ...
Darwin : Cos if you don't know me ...

RD: YOU DON'T KNOW DICK!!

Chorus : Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!

SH:On the shoulders of midgets we built up this machine,
DD:YEAH!!!
RD:Silence that watch... Paley
Growing stronger and harder almost daily, storming wilber by force as we framed the discourse until the science split in schismatic divorce then Darwin took to the seas to see what no one had seen, and ever since then we've been increasingly keen, they may never adore us, but they'll no longer ignore us, give it to 'em PZ hit these BLEEP with the chorus!!!

Chorus : Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
The Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's still smarter than you he studied biology!

Then there was Darrow dukin' it out with the straight and the narrow a ragin' bull in the ring, he did his thing, and took it on the chin like he was bobby de niro.
We might have lost at Scopes, beaten down by the dopes, and the stooges of popes, but in losin' we coped, becomin' more than we hoped, creationists slipped on the soap of their own slippery slope, what was impossible, improbable, is now wholly unstoppable .... the creationst foldup you hate us talking bull, don't you know that this Dick BLEEP frickin' unblockable ...

Chorus : Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
The Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's still smarter than you he studied biology!

Now the machine of our making, sees culture ripe for the taking Cos I'm the rapper thats rappin the .... unlike the Catholic, Muslim or even the Jew, believes that no God but science could ever be true, hell if I was dyslexic I'd even hate "dog" too.

Time to open your eyes, get yourself wise, the age of science has arised to be religions demise, and while you turkeys all cry, shouting why God oh why, I'll still be poppin' my collar earning my dollars in Allah.

Chorus : Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
The Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's still smarter than you he studied biology!

Chorus : Yeah he's the Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's smarter than you he's got a science degree!
The Dick to the Doc to the phd,
he's still smarter than you he studied biology!

Now, watch this other video below. It doesn't seem funny now, does it?

Posted in , , |

If you enjoyed this post Subscribe to our feed

105 Comments

  1. John Murphy | April 2, 2008 12:23 PM

    LOL. Made by someone brilliant. Thanks for the anti-Dawkins satire, Shalanonymous!

     
  2. sciencefreak | April 2, 2008 1:47 PM

    We might have lost at Scopes, beaten down by the dopes, and the stooges of popes, but in losin' we coped, becomin' more than we hoped, creationists slipped on the soap of their own slippery slope, what was impossible, improbable, is now wholly unstoppable

    Anti-Dawkins satire all right. Uh-huh, uh-huh...

     
  3. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 2:37 PM

    Again, I don't know why people keep accusing E&R of being Shalini. I know Shalini and this isn't her blog. She's on the DL now and she wouldn't be publicising herself like this in her current situation so just give it up people.

    Here's my take on the video: http://unorthodoxatheism.blogspot.com/2008/04/d-to-dawk-to-phd.html

    And the lyric is D to the Dawk to the PhD, I believe.

     
  4. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:01 PM

    Shalini EXPOSED!!

    Reed, Shalini is crazy for publicity, she likes publicity and is ARROGANT and now EXPOSED!!!

    Shalini Sehkar EXPOSED!!

     
  5. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:05 PM

    Murphy and Cretinist,

    Detective FAIL.

    Since you goons don't have any actual evidence that I'm 'Shalini Sehkar', why don't you all just shut the fuck up about it?

     
  6. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:06 PM

    Shalini EXPOSED!!

    She links to the Rational Response Squad!!

    Shalini EXPOSED!!!!!

     
  7. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:07 PM

    So, everyone who links to the RRS is Shalini Sehkar? That's your evidence?

    FAIL.

     
  8. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:11 PM

    Ummm... isn't that evidence against E&R being Shalini? The RRS is a dishonest collective of dimwits and liars. Why would someone as bright (and strangely attractive) as Shalini link to such a fucked group of people? This is obviously a new blogger who has yet to discover the idiocy that is Brian Cutler and Kelly's Tits.

     
  9. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:12 PM

    But of course... the creationist isn't one to consider any sort of evidence. Of course! Just keep accusing E&R of being Shalini (a benign accusation that only makes E&R cooler than she was before) and we'll just keep laughing at you.

     
  10. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:14 PM

    Shalini Sehkar EXPOSED!!!!

    Shalini was at the RRS house last year from Christmas blaspheming and using her famous theistard word!!! This blog is just full of blasphemy and theistard!!!!!!!!!!!

    EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  11. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:15 PM

    By the way, Shalini is my friend. E&R comes fairly close to Shalini's genius, but she misses the Shalini mark. We won't have another blogger as brilliant and snarky as her in a long time. E&R is just the next best thing.

    Sorry, girl, just being brutally honest.

     
  12. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:16 PM

    Creationist EXPOSED!!!

    You're an idiot.

    Creationist EXPOSED!!!!1!!11!!!one!!!

     
  13. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:17 PM

    Exposed for what? I am a scientist at AiG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  14. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:18 PM

    I am a scientist at AiG!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    FAIL!

     
  15. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:20 PM

    Why fail?

    I am a scientist at AiG and you are a stupid Darwinist!

     
  16. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:21 PM

    I am not a Darwinist.

    Keep failing spectacularly. Laughing at you has become one of my hobbies.

     
  17. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:24 PM

    I am a scientist at AiG and you are a stupid Darwinist!

    ROFLCOPTER!

    Holy fucking Jesus Christ giving two handjobs with his nail holes and eating out his non-virgin slut of a mother's cunt simultaneously!!! That's hilarious!!! LMAO!!!

     
  18. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:25 PM

    Creationist's comments make me want to fellate Jesus Fucking Christ while he hangs on the cross!

     
  19. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:27 PM

    You are an idiot because you think that science can explain anything and your blasphemy

     
  20. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:27 PM

    Creationist's comments make me want to fellate Jesus Fucking Christ while he hangs on the cross!

    Yeah?? Well, Creationtard's claims make me want to shove my tongue up the Holy Spirit's asshole and give him the best rim job he's ever had! Beat that!

     
  21. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:28 PM

    Creationtard, science explains why we have to deal with your dumb ass. If it weren't for vaccinations or AC/Heating or refrigeration, you'd be dead. And I'd be fucking glad.

     
  22. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:29 PM

    Lord, save me from this Darwinist persecution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  23. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:29 PM

    ATHEISTS WANT CHRISTIANS DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  24. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:30 PM

    Beware the CAPS LOCK key! That is the Christian Gawd's secret weapon!

     
  25. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:31 PM

    Not all Christians. Pretty much just you.

    Most Christians I know would say that you make their religion look worse than it is and they would share my sentiments about you. Go fuck a rabid porcupine.

     
  26. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:33 PM

    Go ahead and delete that fine bit of spam not-Shalini. Copy-pasting comments isn't playing by flame war rules.

     
  27. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:34 PM

    SHALINI SEHKAR EXPOSED!!!

    She deleted my AiG arguments because she could not refute them!!! See how dishonest Darwinists are??????

     
  28. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:36 PM

    1. I am not Shalini Sehkar.

    2. I deleted your copy-and-paste spam because I don't like having spam on my blog.

    3. What is the scientific theory of creationism?

    4. Fuck yourself with a rusty saw.

    kthxbai.

     
  29. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:37 PM

    (3:35:17 PM) Evolved: let's bet that he will scream about censorship
    (3:35:20 PM) Evolved: and 'darwinists'

    She totally called it in advance.

     
  30. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:38 PM

    Apparently my computer clock that AIM feeds from is a minute or so faster than Blogger's clock... but it was totally in advance of your pitiful squealing.

     
  31. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:39 PM

    SHALINI SEHKAR EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!

    EVEN AN ATHEIST EXPOSED HER THAT SHE ADMITTED TO CENSORSHIP AND DARWINISM, but she lied that she is not a DARWINIST!!!!!!!!!!!

    Exposed!!

    Shalini Sehkar EXPOSED!!

     
  32. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:39 PM

    And I didn't mean "pitiful" as in, "I have pity on you." I meant it as in, "You're a knuckle-dragging troglodyte and you have the intellect of the average earthworm.

     
  33. Anonymous | April 2, 2008 3:40 PM

    comprehension class

    i has it

     
  34. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:40 PM

    EVEN AN ATHEIST EXPOSED HER THAT SHE ADMITTED TO CENSORSHIP AND DARWINISM, but she lied that she is not a DARWINIST!!!!!!!!!!!

    You seem to be misunderstanding me on thirty-twelve different levels.

     
  35. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:43 PM

    Oh, and cretin, I am quite tired of hearing the 'Shalini Sehkar exposed' shit being repeated mindlessly on my blog.

    I will soon delete any further drivel containing that repetitive phrase. Use your brains while commenting.

     
  36. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 3:49 PM

    Oh, God...

    Creationist, haven't we been over this? Just because somebody has loads of blasphemy, uses the word theistard, and is pro-evolution does not mean that they are Shalini Sehkar! I do the same thing! So does virtually EVERYBODY who writes an Atheist blog.

    Under your definition of Shalini Sehkar, Reed Braden is Shalini (it fits too because he's a girl).

     
  37. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:51 PM

    EVIDENCE:

    THE WORD THEISTARD
    GENE POOL
    NAZI DARWINISM
    VULGAR LANGUAGE
    PUBLICITY WHORING
    SHE SAID THAT SHE MET RICHARD DAWKINS

     
  38. inevershutup | April 2, 2008 3:51 PM

    Theistard is such a lovely word. Shalini may have coined it, but I see it everywhere now. The poor unfortunate with the untreated schizophrenia fears women. I personally like women who aren't meek and submissive; having a functioning brain is chocolate chips in the banana muffin.

    Whoever our host is is immaterial as long as she keeps bringing the snark.

     
  39. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:51 PM

    I am an idiot. I suck at life so I troll teh internets. I am an emo kid who is going to die now. Okay thanks now bye!

     
  40. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:52 PM

    I DID NOT WRITE THAT!!! PLEASE HELP ME OTHER CHRISTIANS THERE ARE ATHIEST IMPOSTORS HERE!!!

     
  41. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 3:54 PM

    Calling me a girl is an insult to women.

    I make for an ugly fucking woman.

    Proof.

    Can't argue with that!

     
  42. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:54 PM

    Creotard,

    Stop the caps-locked shit. Comments that consist solely of caps-locked brainless drivel will soon count as spam, and they will be deleted faster than Dembski and DaveScot delete shit on Uncommonly Dense.

     
  43. creationist | April 2, 2008 3:57 PM

    Shalini Sehkar,

    Stop the blasphemous shit. Comments that consist solely of hate drivel will soon count as admission that you are Shalini Sehkar, and they will be exposed.

     
  44. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 3:58 PM

    Cretinshit,

    I don't see any comments by Shalini Sehkar here. Are you hallucinating? Do you need some meds?

     
  45. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 3:58 PM

    "THE WORD THEISTARD
    GENE POOL
    NAZI DARWINISM
    VULGAR LANGUAGE
    PUBLICITY WHORING
    SHE SAID THAT SHE MET RICHARD DAWKINS"

    Haha... that's crap. First of all, neither Evolved Rationalist nor Shalini Sehkar nor Reed Braden nor I are Nazis.

    Of course, though that definition almost fits me, it also fits Reed Braden better than Shalini Sehkar.

    And now you'll pardon a temporary boast...

    I met Richard Dawkins too!

     
  46. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:01 PM

    SHALINI SEHKAR EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!

    ... AS A FUCKING SEXY GIRL I'D PAY TOP DOLLAR TO BED WITH! SRSLY! SHALINI'S SEX IS TEH ONLY SEXES TO RIVAL JESUS IN AWESOMENESSSSSS!!!!!!! WOO!!!! JESUS RULZ!!! BUT SHALINI COOCH IS BETTER!!!!!!! TAHT IS WHY I STALK HER ON THE INTERWUBZ AND ACCUSE OTHER BLOGGERS OF BEING HER WHEN I LOSE HER TRAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I LIVE IN ME MUMS BASEMENT AND I PRETEND TO BE A SCIENTIST WHEN THE TRUTH IS I WOULDNT BE ABLE TO TELL YOU THE DIFFERENTS BETWEEN AN ERLENMEYER FLASK AND A RETORT!!!1!ilovejesus!!!!11!!!1!!!

    SHALINI SEHKAR EXPOSED!!!11!!11!1!one!!!11!1!OMGZZZZ!!!!!!!

     
  47. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:03 PM

    Wow... that was so very intelligible...

    Would you mind rephrasing that with... I dunno... proper grammar and some kind of thought behind those words?

     
  48. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:03 PM

    I did not write that! I am a scientist at AiG. Darwinists are persecuting me because they have no science for atheism, and we know that science is on the creation side!!!!

     
  49. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 4:04 PM

    Scientist, eh?

    Cretin, could you provide some links to papers that you have published in peer-reviewed scientific journals?

     
  50. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:04 PM

    I met Professor Dawkins too. I've also had a 150-minute conversation with Christopher Hitchens in a bar. I've spoken with Sam Harris and his sexy wife, Dan Dennett, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Margaret Downey, Ellen Johnson and Eugenie Scott. I don't see how any of that is relevant to anything.

     
  51. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:05 PM

    Oh really?

    Mind telling me your name so I know what work you've done? I might need to thank you for a good belly laugh.

     
  52. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:05 PM

    I can't tell you my name because Darwinist will kill or hurt me!!!!!!!!

     
  53. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:07 PM

    ...

    If you are an AiG scientist, your name is probably on the site anyway...

     
  54. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:08 PM

    Fine... you want me to use proper grammar?

    I'm an idiot and I'm only stalking Evolved and Rational because I think she might be Shalini Sehkar based on no evidence whatsoever and I have a fetish for brown-skinned biology chicks. This probably developed after my Indian 7th-grade biology teacher, Ms. Patel, touched me inappropriately and turned me off of science and on to brown people for the rest of my miserable life. I just want to be loved!

     
  55. creationist (the scientist) | April 2, 2008 4:12 PM

    Darwinists are trying to defame me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  56. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:13 PM

    You know what... he's right. The excessive punctuation defames him enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  57. creationist (the "scientist") | April 2, 2008 4:15 PM

    If I registered for a Blogger account, this stuff wouldn't happen.

    By the way, I give great blowjobs.

     
  58. creationist (the scientist) | April 2, 2008 4:16 PM

    I am a real scientist!! Please be honest, Darwinists!!!!!!! Don't defame me!!

     
  59. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:16 PM

    I give better blowjobs!

     
  60. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 4:17 PM

    Ah, I give great blowjobs too. Hey cretin 'scientist', do you want me to suck your delusions away from you?

     
  61. creationist (the pseudo-scientist) | April 2, 2008 4:17 PM

    Not better than MY blowjobs!

     
  62. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:18 PM

    WAY better than your blowjobs!

     
  63. creationist (the homosexual) | April 2, 2008 4:19 PM

    Nuh uh!

     
  64. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:19 PM

    Uh huh!

     
  65. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:19 PM

    Evolved Rationalist, I want a blowjob from you!! You see, I'm a virgin and I troll your blog because you turn me on and make me masturbate. Fuck Jesus, I am yours and I want to bang you now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  66. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:20 PM

    I once gave a guy such a great blowjob, we both got pregnant! Explain that one, scientist!

     
  67. creationist (the aroused) | April 2, 2008 4:21 PM

    Wow! That is a good blowjob!

     
  68. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:21 PM

    I AM THE REAL AIG SCIENTIST HERE!!!!

    Darwinists cannot argue with me so they insult and pretend and defame me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     
  69. creationist (the real one) | April 2, 2008 4:22 PM

    Okay, the next 'creationist' who posts is a homosexual Darwinist liar!!!

    I am the real scientist!!!

     
  70. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:22 PM

    The creationist made another good point. Reed, you're forgetting to use the excessive punctuation!!!!!!!!!

    Then you'll be indistinguishable!!!!!!!!

    And throw in some ramblings about being persecuted by "Nazi Darwinists" that don't exist (except in your mind) while you're at it.

     
  71. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:23 PM

    Wow... hahahaha... There are now at least three people commenting as creationist.

     
  72. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:23 PM

    NO I DID NOT write that! Please stop, DArwinists!

     
  73. creationist (the real one) | April 2, 2008 4:24 PM

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    The other creationist is a homofaggot LIAR!!!!!

     
  74. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:24 PM

    Okay... if you insist! No other creationist post until our "scientist" replies. Then he'll be the homosexual darwinist liar!

     
  75. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:25 PM

    NO YOU ARE THE FAGGOT I DID NOT write that please stop imposting and listen to the evidence that EVOLVED RATIONALIST is SHALINI SEHKAR!!!!!!

     
  76. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:25 PM

    Well you folks ruined that before it started. Congrats.

     
  77. creationist (the real one) | April 2, 2008 4:26 PM

    Too many faggot darwinists here! YOu're all wrong!

     
  78. creationist (the scientist) | April 2, 2008 4:26 PM

    YES I AM A CLOSET FAG!!

    How did you know?

    Boohoo, now I'll be sacked from AiG!!! Noooo, I have always refused to come out of the closed!!!

    I AM A CLOSET FAGS!!! AIG SCIENTISTS ARE ALL CLOSET FAGS!!! I HAVE HAD SEX WITH KEN HAM!!!!!!

     
  79. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:27 PM

    Oooh!!! Can I get Ken Ham's number from you? He's a cutie!

     
  80. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:27 PM

    sex with ken ham is the best!!! he is a closet fags!! hovind is lucky to get buttsecks in jail!!!!

     
  81. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:27 PM

    Oh God... I've been asking you for evidence since I first started talking to you...

    You have to date not provided anything that's not circumstantial enough that it doesn't implicate that Reed Braden is Shalini Sehkar.

     
  82. the AiG creationist | April 2, 2008 4:28 PM

    STOP IMPOSTING ME!!!!!!!!

    Please. I am not homosexual. The other creationist fakes are liars!!!

     
  83. Rev. Reed Braden | April 2, 2008 4:29 PM

    Okay folks, this has been fun, but I must go do important stuff with my valuable time... something that real scientists (not that I claim to be one) should be doing right now. Cancer and AIDS are still out there, scientist! Get to work! Stop wasting your time on old zombie jews (Jesus) and even older sailor zoophiles (Noah) and start curing some of this shit your loving god made for us to die from!

     
  84. AiG creationist | April 2, 2008 4:29 PM

    I AM a closet fag with split personalities. Don't listen to my previous comment as I AM A HOMOSEXUAL FAG, just like all the other AiG scientists!!!!

     
  85. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:30 PM

    Homophobe...

     
  86. the aig creationist | April 2, 2008 4:30 PM

    I'm not a homosexual! The little children I have sex with are all girls!!!!!!! I swear!!!!!!!!!

     
  87. creationist (the scientist) | April 2, 2008 4:32 PM

    I am a virgin!! Please, sex is a sin before marriage!! Please stop it Darwinists!! Please!!

     
  88. creationist TM | April 2, 2008 4:32 PM

    I AM A CLOSET FAG WHO HAD SEX WITH KEN HAM!!!

    Buttsecks wins!!

     
  89. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:33 PM

    I would do Jesus!!!!

     
  90. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:33 PM

    Shalini Sehkar, I want to bang you!!!

     
  91. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:35 PM

    Please let's get back to my EXPOSE that this blog is Shalini Sehkar's site!!!!!!

     
  92. creationist (not gay) | April 2, 2008 4:36 PM

    Next creationist to post is a homosexual faggot. I am the real creationist.

     
  93. Anonymous | April 2, 2008 4:36 PM

    The amount of homophobia on this site is seriously scary.

     
  94. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:37 PM

    FAGGOTS burn in hell!!

    Stop it, I am not gay!!

     
  95. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:37 PM

    I am not gay, I fuck little children who go on my AiG museum tours!!

     
  96. Cetacea | April 2, 2008 4:39 PM

    "Please let's get back to my EXPOSE that this blog is Shalini Sehkar's site!!!!!!"

    You mean rambling about how saying the theistard word makes somebody Shalini Sehkar.

     
  97. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:42 PM

    I have evidence but Darwinists keep imposting me.

     
  98. creationist (not gay) | April 2, 2008 4:43 PM

    That is because I am a CLOSET FAG, bastards!!

     
  99. creationist (i am gay) | April 2, 2008 4:43 PM

    NO I MEAN I AM STILL IN THE CLOSET, just a gay!!

     
  100. Anonymous | April 2, 2008 4:43 PM

    Stop it dudes. Get a life.

     
  101. creationist | April 2, 2008 4:47 PM

    I am an AiG scientist.

    I am a closet fag.

    I fucked Ken Ham.

    I lie a lot.

    I want to bang Shalini.

    I might be bisexual.

    I also like little children.

     
  102. Evolved Rationalist | April 2, 2008 4:49 PM

    *Keep comments on topic, please.*

     
  103. Shalini Sehkar | April 3, 2008 8:38 PM

    Will all you fucking theistards shut the fuck up! I only get 5 minutes of internet time while in jail, and you are wasting it!

     
  104. hypocee | April 4, 2008 1:17 PM

    As someone's pointed out on Pharyngula, I'm pretty sure "I'll still be poppin' my collar earnin' my dollars in Allah" should be "poppin' my collar earnin' my dollars an hour". Sure he's British and technically earns pounds, but "dollars in Allah" seems like a complete non-sequitur, especially with Dawkins, while "dollars an hour" seems like a very hip-hop phraseology for salary/royalties.

     
  105. hypocee | April 4, 2008 1:35 PM

    Arrgh! Sorry, sorry. I searched the posts for specific terms, but hadn't read the whole Pharyngula thread. "More dollars than Allah" is even better.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)