You cannot see the fucking screen!

9/30/2008 | 2:57 PM | Evolved Rationalist

I will be hosting the Tangled Bank here tomorrow and I am also busy with loads of other stuff, so enjoy the little piece of /b/tardation below while I sort through the submissions.


Things that make you go *facepalm*

| 3:28 AM | Evolved Rationalist

[Click to enlarge]



9/29/2008 | 6:24 AM | Evolved Rationalist

You are 97% 4chan material.

You are the true face of 4chan. You're the type of person who finds racist jokes and sick humor hilarious, raids CoS, makes personal army requests whenever you see someone you dislike on Youtube, gets off to 5-year-olds, and calls Gamestop at 3 AM to ask for Battletoads. You scare me... and yet, I love you.

How 4chan are you?
Take More Quizzes

This can't be happening to me. Am I too lost to be saved? Am I really this /b/tarded?

Also, CoS raids = CANCER.


Why, Christards? Why?

| 6:23 AM | Evolved Rationalist

Fundie Christarded morons can never agree on what supposedly happens to people who never knew about the 'fact' that they had to worship some zombie Jewish carpenter or burn in hell for eternity before they died. Some are honest enough to say that they believe that their god actually roasts those people in hell anyway; while other Christians try to fudge and claim that god forgives people that have not heard of the zombie cult leader. A Christian that I was talking to claimed that god forgives those who have not heard the 'good news', and that Christians should go around spreading the 'good news' so that more people would be 'saved' by knowing and 'accepting Jesus'.

This brings me to the question: Why, Christards?

If Christians think that people who don't know about Jesus go to heaven anyway, why do they bother evangelizing? Why spend all that time and money to save someone when someone is considered 'saved' already by not knowing about Jesus? If you are truly interested in saving someone from hell, why run the risk of telling someone about your cult and have them reject it, only to burn in hell later? Wouldn't it be simple common sense to shut the fuck up about your zombie god so that more people would be ignorant of your great holy truth and thus nicely go to heaven instead of burning forever and ever? (Wait...Christianity...common sense?! Who was I kidding?)

Seriously, this doesn't make any fucking sense. It is exactly what we mean when we say 'OH MY GOD WHAT IS THIS I DON'T EVEN....'. It is stupid, fucktarded, illogical, insane, and simply theistarded. Only a theistard could believe in this shit without noticing the glaring problem with the crapped-up piece of dumbfuck theology.

If you instead choose the hardcore fundie way and say that everyone who did not hear about Jesus automatically goes to hell, why? How is it their fault that they were born into the circumstances that did not allow them to hear about Jesus? How about some kid who died by being blown to pieces in some distant war-torn country without being 'saved' by the zombie carpenter? Hellfire for eternity? Wouldn't god know that those people would not have had a chance to be 'saved' before throwing them into hell? Did god plan that out on purpose for some sick reason - like making sure that Christards can nicely whine and BAWWWWW about how people should donate to their cultish institution in order to spread the 'good word'? Did god simply do all this for his own sadistic pleasure? If so, what type of god are you worshipping? How could you claim that non-Christards are morally deficient with any credibility after admitting that your worship a god like that?

What the flying fuck?

Intelligent Christians who would like to provide us evil godless hell-bound heathens with a coherent answer are welcome to do so in the comments. If you sound like yet another typical theistarded moron, don't get all butthurt when people have lulz at your expense. You fully deserve the mockery for believing in such stupid shit...unless you can intelligently defend your views, of course.

Therefore, GOGOGO! Comment away.


"God is a lizard loving dick!"

9/27/2008 | 7:18 PM | Evolved Rationalist

[19:00] evoatheist: i'm back
[19:00] [email protected]: wb
[19:00] evoatheist: a lizard pooped on my laptop
[19:00] [email protected]: trouble?
[19:00] [email protected]: lol
[19:00] evoatheist: right on my debian sticker
[19:00] evoatheist: not funny
[19:00] [email protected]: suck
[19:00] evoatheist: really not funny
[19:00] evoatheist: *sob*
[19:00] evoatheist: i'm lizardphobic enough as it is
[19:00] evoatheist: *shudder*
[19:00] evoatheist: reeeeeallllyyyy not cool
[19:00] [email protected]: how did a lizard get on your laptop?
[19:01] evoatheist: well it was in the living room
[19:01] evoatheist: and....ugh
[19:01] evoatheist: i dunno
[19:01] [email protected]: how was it in the living room?
[19:01] evoatheist: i dunno
[19:01] [email protected]: how very odd
[19:01] evoatheist: i know
[19:01] evoatheist: and then
[19:01] evoatheist: i went downstairs
[19:01] evoatheist: and saw the poop
[19:01] [email protected]: having lizard for dinner?
[19:01] evoatheist: it was right on the debian sticker! the one that a good friend gave me at defcon. i am raging right now
[19:01] evoatheist: fuck
[19:02] evoatheist: FUCK
[19:02] evoatheist: damnit
[19:02] evoatheist: FUCK
[19:02] evoatheist: fucking shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] [email protected]: for a second I thought you meant your copy of suse crapped out
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: shit
[19:02] evoatheist: LOL
[19:02] [email protected]: but then I remembered your a debian person
[19:02] evoatheist: oh lol
[19:02] evoatheist: yeah yeah you're 1337
[19:02] evoatheist: FUCKING LIZARDS
[19:02] evoatheist: i can deal with a skiddie infestation but not a lizard
[19:03] evoatheist: noooo
[19:03] evoatheist: this sucks
[19:03] evoatheist: if i ever find the lizard that did this
[19:03] evoatheist: RRRRAAAAGGGGEEEE
[19:03] evoatheist: it would join the pain series on ED
[19:03] evoatheist: seriously
[19:05] [email protected]: how are you being infested with lizards in pittsburg?
[19:05] evoatheist: i dunno
[19:05] [email protected]: it's liek an episode of the twilight zone
[19:05] evoatheist: i'm raging so bad
[19:05] evoatheist: fucking lizard
[19:05] evoatheist: too bad lizards cannot be hacked
[19:05] evoatheist: eh
[19:05] evoatheist:
[19:05] [email protected]: sure they can be
[19:05] evoatheist: not in the sense
[19:05] evoatheist: that i'm talking about
[19:06] [email protected]: /r/aid
[19:06] evoatheist: ra/i/d insecticide works on lizards?!
[19:06] [email protected]: in high enough quantities, it'll kill anything
[19:06] evoatheist: yeah
[19:06] evoatheist: unless the lizard bought a dog
[19:07] [email protected]: yeah, because they do that
[19:07] evoatheist: exactly
[19:07] evoatheist: to prevent hackers on steroids from fucking with them
[19:07] evoatheist: no seriously
[19:07] evoatheist: this sucks
[19:07] evoatheist: there is lizard poo on my laptop
[19:07] evoatheist: that is the problem
[19:08] evoatheist: this is proof that there is no god
[19:09] evoatheist: a loving god would never allow this to happen
[19:09] [email protected]: actually, that's a rather statistically unlikely event
[19:09] [email protected]: proof that there is a god, and he hates you
[19:09] evoatheist: but...why?
[19:09] [email protected]: dunno
[19:09] evoatheist: i moderate four boards on three different chans. that should get me into heaven!
[19:09] [email protected]: perhaps he's a member to 12chan or whatever it's called
[19:09] evoatheist: 12chan? i don't go there
[19:09] evoatheist: not my thing
[19:10] [email protected]: maybe he like ebaums world
[19:10] evoatheist: maybe he's a gaiafag
[19:10] evoatheist: *shudder* i'm so gonna burn
[19:10] evoatheist: grrrr
[19:11] evoatheist: the sticker cannot be saved
[19:11] evoatheist: FUCK LIZARDS
[19:12] evoatheist: god is a lizard-loving dick
[19:12] [email protected]: you should name the lizard 'god', like I named my car "the internet"
[19:12] evoatheist: seriously?
[19:13] [email protected]: it's not a big truck
[19:13] evoatheist: it's a series of tubes
[19:13] [email protected]: no, the internet is a 99 chevy lumina
[19:13] evoatheist: my ipod is named 'mudkip'
[19:13] [email protected]: hahaha you have an iPod! You love Apple!
[19:13] [email protected]: applefag
[19:13] evoatheist: dicks everywhere
[19:13] evoatheist: noooooo
[19:13] evoatheist: ipods are not macs
[19:13] evoatheist: big difference

This conversation provides some insight into the oh-so-important (to my fanboys) question of why I am still single. Seen enough yet?


Religion is a demotivator

9/26/2008 | 10:22 PM | Evolved Rationalist


Skiddie "Anon Sucks" BUSTED!

| 2:31 PM | Evolved Rationalist

This is what our resident skiddie keylogging bastard had to say before his impending FAIL:

I am not a little kid. I have taken computer science, I am an elite hacker, and this site is going to go down! Also ER should not make fun of me. I will not be the next Mary because I can do things like proxy and use a disposable e-mail address so ER cannot get my real e-mail like what she did to Mary! I am an elite hacker!

ER will never get my e-mail and make me the next Mary!
Yeah, yeah...whatever. Here is Anon Sucks, displayed in full glory:

Justin Karskayzy
[email protected]

More dox /r/equested for the lulz and for great justice.

Tor and Flash are not always the best of friends, Justin skiddie. You have just lost the game, but thanks for skidding playing.

Enjoy your ruin, fail, and IRL V&. You are now in much deeper shit than you could have ever imagined.

Me > You

Also, LULZ.


Nobody expects the Skiddie Infestation!

9/25/2008 | 3:30 PM | Evolved Rationalist

The Great Skiddie Infestation, Part II, has officially begun. Part I can be found here.

This time, it is still the same old crappy skiddie shit as before. Keyloggers and viruses are being sent to my inbox by that lulzy asshole known as 'Anon Sucks', along with long rants about how I am going to get 'hacked' because I support Anonymous. (cf: asking for it)

He also loves bragging about the size of his inflated e-peen and challenging me to internet pissing contests which I decline because I don't see the need to play childish games with retards.

Anon Sucks: WHY SO SKIDDISH? Me > You.

He is probably going to get V& soon when he pisses the wrong person off. I honestly don't give a shit apart from laughing at his FAIL attempts to use his leet CSIII skills and having major lulz at his expense, but the partyvan sure does care.


Therefore...Monty Python! Whooooo!

Yeah, I'm random.

Remember, folks: Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition Skiddie Infestation!

UPDATE: You can't make this shit up. Here is a comment from the skiddie douchebag:
You are arrogant because when I said that I take Computer Science, you laughed and said that I take the Encyclopedia Dramatica CSIII. That is a lie, and I took the real CSIII not the Mike Sandy childish one. I am an elite hacker!
His level of fail is way over 9000.

He took CSIII, folks. He took Computer Fucking Science III, he claims to be an 'elite hacker' without knowing the meaning of the term, he attempts to keylog people and fails, he tries to DDoS my site and fails miserably all the time, he brags about shit that he cannot do, and he cannot hack his way out of a paper bag if his life depends on it. However, all is good because he took CSIII. Serious business.


This makes perfect sense

| 1:37 PM | Evolved Rationalist

Found here.


"Oh lawd is that some transitionals?"

9/23/2008 | 3:00 PM | Evolved Rationalist

When it comes to the issue of transitional fossils in the case of human evolution, creationists often claim that none of the hominid fossils discovered are transitional fossils at all, insisting that they are either all-ape or all-human (and thus can be easily classified into 'ape' and 'human' categories). Scientists disagree, and point out that the fossils are from a number of closely related species intermediate between apes and humans.

Creationists also claim that evolution is somehow weakened by the fact that scientists often disagree on the classification of hominid fossils, failing to realize that in evolutionary theory, one would expect to find the fossils hard to classify, and that if the fossils could easily be placed into clear-cut categories, it would lend credence the creationist story instead.

Ed Brayton
has a post up where he includes the following chart (by Jim Foley) that shows several of the major hominid specimens and how the major creationist writers classify them:

If the fossils are easily classified into 'ape' and 'human' categories, why do creationists disagree so much on how to classify them? If the lines dividing the fossils into neatly packaged categories are indeed as clear as they would like you to believe, why can't the leading lights of 'scientific creationism' see those lines and agree on them? Don't the creationists realize that, contrary to their pet story, the difficulty of classifying the hominid fossils is due to the fact that the fossils are intermediates and not all-ape or all-human as they like to claim? Again, the confusion and disagreements are simply what we would expect if the evolutionary explanation, and not the creationist one, were true.

Without even realizing it, the creationists have made our point for us yet again. If only the 'scientific creationists' were open-minded and scientific enough to fully comprehend the implications of this, they would realize that their creation myth has more holes than a porous sponge and decide to join the rest of us in reality.


Superstition debunked, butthurt follows

9/22/2008 | 10:25 PM | Evolved Rationalist

An epic example of science successfully debunking superstitious dogma:

FOR centuries the faithful have gathered in their thousands to watch one of Christianity’s most enduring mysteries. But yesterday they were told that the “miracle of the blood” was an elaborate hoax.

Every year Neapolitans pack into the city’s cathedral to witness the “miracle”. In an atmosphere nearing hysteria, the archbishop holds up a glass phial that is said to contain the dried blood of San Gennaro, the city’s patron saint, and declares that it has liquefied.

Liquefaction, a central part of life in Naples, is held to guarantee good fortune. By contrast, its failure is thought to presage disasters ranging from the eruption of Mount Vesuvius to the defeat of Napoli football club.

But yesterday’s ceremony, which marked the 1,700th anniversary of the martyrdom of San Gennaro, was overshadowed by a claim made by an Italian scientist that the liquefaction was nothing but a fake.


Read the article for the scientific explanation.

The predictable BAWWWW responses from the butthurt crowd soon followed:

Marchese Pierluigi Sanfelice, an aristocrat who is one of the official guardians of the phial and takes part in the liquefaction ceremony, said that the Church had conducted tests on the phial in the 1980s which showed that its contents included haemoglobin, the key pigment in blood corpuscles.

Oh, the Church did a scientific study on this phenomena, you say? Why am I not impressed?

That aside, isn't it amazing that the scientific evidence for such a miracle never made it into a peer-reviewed journal? Wouldn't such a discovery shake the scientific community? Why has nobody heard of their so-called 'study', and why can't we find references to this in a reputable scientific source? Could it be because the so-called 'study' is simply bullshit and mere hot air from the gullible crowd?

The Marchese said: “The trouble with scientists is that when they cannot find an explanation they invent one. They simply cannot accept that some things are beyond human understanding.”

Translation: BAWWWWWW

Also, science does not work that way!

Who gets to decide what is and what isn't beyond human understanding? There was a time when rain was beyond human understanding, and if the anti-science lunatics had their way, science would come to a standstill. Science is the candle that shines light into the dark crevices of the universe, and the anti-science morons want to put that light out simply to protect their ancient, antiquated dogma. We must not let them win.

Onwards, science soldiers!


Vatican hypocrites to obfuscate for Jesus

9/21/2008 | 2:24 PM | Evolved Rationalist

One of the bastions of theistarded dumbfuckery and hypocrisy, the Vatican, has announced that they are going to host an oh-so scientific evolution congress, and that it is scientific because no creationists or intelligent design creationists are going to be invited. Before you say 'Awwww, sweet!', take a moment to realize that when those liars for Jesus are concerned, there is often more to the story. In this case, the theistards at the Vatican are happily inviting theologians to prevent the congress from becoming 'too scientific' and - wait for this - they say so themselves later in the article! They admit to using science as a front to push their theistarded dogma forward while preventing 'too much science' to be let into the issue at the same time. Oh, the irony and hypocrisy!

Jesuit Father Marc Leclerc, a philosophy professor at the Gregorian, told Catholic News Service Sept. 16 that organizers "wanted to create a conference that was strictly scientific" and that discussed rational philosophy and theology along with the latest scientific discoveries.
I have some news for those theistards: Theology is not science. Science is science - and that is it. A conference that is both 'strictly scientific' and includes 'theology' at the same time is a paradox. It is an impossibility. It is either one or the other, and there is no way a strictly scientific conference could also include superstitious, unproven , unscientific, irrational dogma.

The sad thing is that I am sure the appeasers/framers would go along with their theistard bedfellows in yapping about how science should embrace religion as religion has embraced science. They will continue BAWWWWing and asking us to compromise while the liars for Jesus conveniently twist and manipulate science for their own fucktarded agenda. The appeasers would lick and worship at the feet of the religious the very moment the religious idiots seemingly make a move towards embracing science without realizing that they are being had. The Vatican kooks are obfuscating the facts for Jesus, and the appeasers would go along with it to promote their 'framing' agenda.

Theistarded hypocrites and framers have one thing in common: They do not give a shit about the truth. They would willingly obfuscate, lie, and bamboozle in order to promote their pet ideas, and that is why I call them bedfellows.
Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, said the other extreme of the evolution debate — proponents of an overly scientific conception of evolution and natural selection — also were not invited.
What the fuck is an 'overly scientific conception of evolution'? Those kooks are actually saying that a scientific theory is not scientific enough because it does not include their particular brand of cultish dogma. Why don't they say that the theory of gravitation is not scientific enough? Why is evolution singled out yet again?

They are actually that stupid and/or dishonest, folks. They do not give a shit about doing any actual science, and the conference will merely be another show about how the Catholic church is progressive, modern, and scientific while not actually supporting real science in any way.

The whole thing is a facade, a sham, and a blatant lie. It is not about science at all - it is about a corrupt, theistarded, moronic Jesus cult trying to twist science in their favor and use scientific discoveries to prop up their idiotic agenda - and the framers and appeasers will bleat and gloat about how awesome the religious nuts are for accepting evolution. The appeasers will screech and whine about how the 'evil, grumpy, militant atheists' are destroying science without realizing that they are the ones being complicit in dragging dogma into science and ultimately replacing scientific discovery with unquestioned lies.

Appeasers/framers need to look at themselves in a mirror before BAWWWWing like morons about how other people are destroying science. Looking/sounding moronic is one of the things that theistards do best; and the way things are going, the appeasers/framers probably want to live up to the standards of their theistarded bedfellows.

Sad, isn't it?


Fail O' Reilly!

9/20/2008 | 10:02 PM | Evolved Rationalist

Awwww.....look at this.

A hacker claims to have cracked the web site of Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly and purloined a list of subscribers to the site, which includes their names, e-mail addresses, city and state, and the password they use for their registration to the site.

The attack was retaliation for comments that O'Reilly made on the air this week about web sites that published e-mails obtained from the Yahoo account of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, according to a press release distributed by WikiLeaks late Friday.

The hacker sent WikiLeaks a screenshot of O'Reilly's subscriber list as proof of the deed, which WikiLeaks has posted online.

This week on his Fox show, O'Reilly slammed web sites, such as WikiLeaks and Gawker, for posting screenshots of e-mails, family photos and a list of contacts taken from Palin's private e-mail account.

"They're trafficking in stolen merchandise," O'Reilly said during one of his shows, calling for their prosecution. He also referred to a site that published the screenshots as "despicable, slimy, scummy."

From Wikileaks:

The message to O' Failley:

Also, more delicious dox.

What apparently happened was that some people from a slimy, scummy, and despicable website attempted to make him the next Hal Turner by nicely raiding his radio show call-in program. However, O' Failley heard of the raid, BAWWWWed, and limited the number of callers allowed on air, while BAWWWWing again about "staying away from the internet."

While all this BAWWWWing was taking place, awesome BAD hackers on steroids (from, of course) found the admin page for one of O'Failley's webpages, which (in an act of complete and utter FAILure) required no password. The list of some of the subscribers was ultimately posted to Wikileaks, and as they say, the rest is history.

As much as I hate to say it, this is probably what O'Failley deserves for being an ignorant, hateful, bumbling dumbass over the whole Palin 'hack' (not a hack, lol) and thinking that the partyvan is his personal army. He basically was asking for it for failing at the internet that badly.

At this point, the only thing that could make this saga more lulzy is if O' Failley suffers a heart attack while on air ranting and raving about 'evil hackers'.

Remember, the internet is serious business.

Disclaimer: I do not support/condone/encourage illegal activity. Posts on this blog should be taken with a grain of salt and a generous serving of lulz.


UPDATED: BAD hackers on steroids!

9/18/2008 | 2:50 PM | Evolved Rationalist



The partyvan apparently shut Wikileaks down DISREGARD THAT after the Palin 'hack' (according to Wikipedia), but they cannot stop the collective whole of the internet.

Go grab some delicious cake. If that link gets V&, there is always the good old TPB for your dox cravings. Information should be free and it will be free.

Also, Bill O' Reilly does not like hackers on steroids or their despicable, slimy, and scummy website.

The aftermath was that delicious cake dox was dropped on O' Reilly.


This is bad, kids! BAD hackers on steroids! BAD!! The partyvan is serious business.


O'Reilly rants again about how he wants all website owners who reposted the delicious dox arrested (OH SHIT is that the partyvan at my door?!), but soon gets his ass kicked by commentator Megyn Kelly. Epic lulz were had.


Disclaimer: I do not support/condone/encourage illegal activity. Posts on this blog should be taken with a grain of salt and a generous serving of lulz.


'Hacking' is bad, kids!

9/17/2008 | 11:50 PM | Evolved Rationalist


I am sure you have all heard of how Anonymous delivered again this news by now.

[sarcasm] Yes, I have heard about the great Anonymous 'hack' of the century and you can stop spamming my inbox right about now, thanks! [/sarcasm]

However, that story is boring.

If you want the juicy details about it all, I suggest this link. At least all the people finding this blog by searching for 'Anonymous hackers' have something more interesting to read than boring tl;dr stories from so-called 'reputable news sources', AMIRITE?

A snippet from the pastebin link:

rubico 09/17/08(Wed)12:57:22 No.85782652

Hello, /b/ as many of you might already know, last night sarah palin’s yahoo was “hacked” and caps were posted on /b/, i am the lurker who did it, and i would like to tell the story.

In the past couple days news had come to light about palin using a yahoo mail account, it was in news stories and such, a thread was started full of newfags trying to do something that would not get this off the ground, for the next 2 hours the acct was locked from password recovery presumably from all this bullshit spamming.

after the password recovery was reenabled, it took seriously 45 mins on wikipedia and google to find the info, Birthday? 15 seconds on wikipedia, zip code? well she had always been from wasilla, and it only has 2 zip codes (thanks online postal service!)

the second was somewhat harder, the question was “where did you meet your spouse?” did some research, and apparently she had eloped with mister palin after college, if youll look on some of the screenshits that I took and other fellow anon have so graciously put on photobucket you will see the google search for “palin eloped” or some such in one of the tabs.

I found out later though more research that they met at high school, so I did variations of that, high, high school, eventually hit on “Wasilla high” I promptly changed the password to popcorn and took a cold shower…

>> rubico 09/17/08(Wed)12:58:04 No.85782727

this is all verifiable if some anal /b/tard wants to think Im a troll, and there isn’t any hard proof to the contrary, but anyone who had followed the thread from the beginning to the 404 will know I probably am not, the picture I posted this topic with is the same one as the original thread.

I read though the emails… ALL OF THEM… before I posted, and what I concluded was anticlimactic, there was nothing there, nothing incriminating, nothing that would derail her campaign as I had hoped, all I saw was personal stuff, some clerical stuff from when she was governor…. And pictures of her family

I then started a topic on /b/, peeps asked for pics or gtfo and I obliged, then it started to get big

Earlier it was just some prank to me, I really wanted to get something incriminating which I was sure there would be, just like all of you anon out there that you think there was some missed opportunity of glory, well there WAS NOTHING, I read everything, every little blackberry confirmation… all the pictures, and there was nothing, and it finally set in, THIS internet was serious business, yes I was behind a proxy, only one, if this shit ever got to the FBI I was fucked, I panicked, i still wanted the stuff out there but I didn’t know how to rapidshit all that stuff, so I posted the pass on /b/, and then promptly deleted everything, and unplugged my internet and just sat there in a comatose state

Then the white knight fucker came along, and did it in for everyone, I trusted /b/ with that email password, I had gotten done what I could do well, then passed the torch , all to be let down by the douchebaggery, good job /b/, this is why we cant have nice things


I hope to Xenu that whoever did this is was behind seven proxies.

Disregard that, did you really think that seven proxies would stop the partyvan? That kid is fucked.

On a more serious note, Wikileaks (where the screenshots of the e-mails were posted by Anonymous) is down. What the flying fuck?

However, screenshots are all over the internet by now, and OH MY GOD HOW DID THIS GET HERE?

This is the 'white knight' who BAWWWWWed and changed the password in order to help Palin. However, he did not blank out the password when posting it on /b/ (of all places). Some /b/tards then apparently proceeded to have more lulz with the new password, making his whole valiant effort an EPIC FAIL.

What the fuck, kid? Why did you have to fail this badly? Or...did you do it on purpose for the lulz? Were you just trolling? Sometimes I can't believe that people are that stupid.


More screenshots:

Eh. This shit really is boring.

However, considering the fact this blog is, well, this is a more interesting screenshot. (More interesting than Palin's inbox, that is.)

From /r9k/:

[update: thread deleted]

I was just about to refer all of you to 4chanarchive as the relevant threads have been deleted, but 4chanarchive has gone 404.


>GONE 404

Is this Catnarok? Is this it? Is this the great V& of the Chans? Is this the end of the internet as we know it? Is this the beginning of the end of free speech?

What about the idea that information should be free?

Somebody hold me, please.

Disclaimer: I do not support/condone/encourage illegal activity. Posts on this blog should be taken with a grain of salt and a generous serving of lulz.


So someone sent me this quote...

9/16/2008 | 1:19 AM | Evolved Rationalist

"Information was designed to be passed freely. If you can't encrypt and protect your data correctly, it is your fault that it fell into other hands and is now public domain."

Comment away.


Keyloggers are for jerks

9/15/2008 | 2:07 PM | Evolved Rationalist

To whom it may concern (you know who you are),

Attempting to send a keylogger to someone through e-mail in a pathetic attempt to 'OMG HAX!!11!!1!' does not make you an 'elite hacker'. It makes you a skiddie.

Carry on, skiddie. Keep those keyloggers directed at my inbox so I can have epic lulz at your expense.

Are you really that fucking dumb, asshole?




The skiddie keylogging fucktard apparently takes Computer Science III. OH SHI--

Why do fellow human beings have to FAIL so badly?


Three more keyloggers were sent to my e-mail. It must be tough being an incompetent skiddie even after taking Computer Science III.


More keyloggers and viruses are being sent to my inbox as I type this. Do you really think that I am afraid of your leet CS III skills, skiddie?

Me > You



| 10:48 AM | Evolved Rationalist

Famous theistarded dumbfuck AV1611VET over at Christian Forums has done it again:

My assertion that God sent the Flood waters to Neptune (not Mars, as DAD asserts), is an honest guess, and my assertion that Noah lived in the area that is now New Jersey is something that I absolutely believe, and have [somewhat] backed up with Wikipedia.
(If you are not familiar with this idiot, go over there and check out his avatar and signature. He actually makes Bananaman Ray Comfort look intelligent. The horror!)

However, I think that there is something that he didn't quite think about: He is going to hell because as a true Christian, he should be quoting the Bible and not referencing Wikipedia. He did not trust god enough, and he is going to burn.

Poor AV1611VET. So much for being a nice, good, cretinous fundie. He simply isn't stupid enough for the Christian god, and he is going to pay for it for eternity.


$cilon of the now

| 4:39 AM | Evolved Rationalist


This has been said over 9000 times...

9/14/2008 | 2:06 AM | Evolved Rationalist

...but I think it is time to say it again.

One of the most irritating straw man arguments I have heard from creationists is that evolution is atheism.

Yes, folks. People actually think that this is the case.


When are the creationist dumbfucks going to understand that the theory of evolution has nothing to do with atheism or even religion for that matter? Whenever I pose a seemingly simple question to creationists along the lines of “Where in the theory of evolution does it say that there is no god?”, most creationists start fumbling, fudging, preaching or quoting from the Bible.

Cretinous theistards, I’ll set it straight once and for all: The scientific theory of evolution is not atheism. Understanding the theory does not require atheism. The theory of evolution is silent on the issue of the existence of an active deity. It is no different from the other scientific theories in that it does not make any claims about your pet religious ideas.

The debate on the existence of an active deity is not a part of the scientific theory of evolution. Evolutionists do not bring god into the facts supporting evolution; rather, it is the creationist who starts the old straw man about evolution actually being 'atheism'.

One creationist went as far as to tell me that evolution is atheistic because the theory of evolution does not mention that god was involved in the evolutionary process. However, this notion is false because the theory of evolution does not make a claim claim one way or another about the existence of a deity, and although the theory of evolution does not say that a supernatural deity directed the evolutionary process, it does not say that there is no active deity. The theological arguments about the existence of an active deity/personal god is not included in the study of origins simply because it is not science and because there is no evidence for the existence for such a deity directing the development of life.

If creationists want to make a convincing argument that evolution equates to atheism because god is not mentioned in the theory of evolution, why don’t the same creationists claim that meteorology also equates to atheism because the meteorologists do not say that god is involved in directing wind patterns?

Creationists insist on mentioning god and pushing their fundamentalist religious beliefs into every damn thing, yet they are the ones who claim that evolutionists are attacking religion. They are the ones viewing creationism as their religion, so perhaps they are merely projecting when they whine about how evolution is an 'atheistic religion'.

This straw man notion is riddled with more contradictions that the ones found in the creationists' holy texts, but there are those who still defend this claptrap in the name of religion. At the rate it is going, I wouldn’t be surprised if the creationists are planning to take us back to the Dark Ages sometime soon in order to make pushing their theistarded god- lunacy into everything much easier. If that happens, science would be fucked ruined. Do not let this happen, folks. Speak out and say something. Do not be appeasers - the cost of appeasing the theistards by keeping quiet about reason is too high.

Onwards, science soldiers!



9/13/2008 | 11:28 PM | Evolved Rationalist

We are in more trouble than anyone could have ever imagined.

h/t: Alcari


I love the internet

9/11/2008 | 8:44 AM | Evolved Rationalist

I was having breakfast while catching up on comments on my previous posts that ranged from rational to funny to theistarded to assholes accusing me of being a 'criminal', when I came across this website. This site is a must-visit if you seek the answer to the (very important) question: "Has the LHC destroyed the world yet?". Leaving aside the fact that you would not be checking the site if the LHC did actually destroy the world, that is...

However, the devil is in the details source code.

[click to enlarge]

The site owner wins OVER 9000 internets (and funny points) for this.


Still alive, STILL ALIVE!!!

9/10/2008 | 2:31 PM | Evolved Rationalist

We're still alive!

Despite what the alarmists and Rapture enthusiasts have been saying, the Large Hardon Hadron Collider has not gobbled up the world. Is there anyone here that is actually surprised?

For the crackpots who might start BAWWWWing and whining about 'evil scientists out to destroy the world', safety information on the LHC can be found here. For more rational folks, the bloggers over at Cosmic Variance are live-blogging the LHC startup, so go over there check out the events as they unfold.

For my fellow lulz junkies, the obligatory ED entry can be found here. Whoever said that the potential 'ZOMG END OF THE WORLD OH NOES!!11!!1!' couldn't be lulzy?

tl;dr version:
Science 1
Crackpots 0



I really hope these aren't the scientists working there or we're all fucked.


Now, serious business.

The Search for the Higgs: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3.

Watch them.


Click to enlarge: A must-see!

9/09/2008 | 4:58 PM | Evolved Rationalist

Poor Mary. Doomed to be a lolcow, forever being milked to the very last drop of epic lulz.


I am being watched...

9/08/2008 | 1:22 PM | Evolved Rationalist

With the rebirth after Catnarök, the golden age of Anonymous will return. A radiant Chan will rise up which no flames of perdition can touch. In its boards, the noble Anon who fought will live on in joy. [The Book of Anon: The Book of Catnarok]


Fundie Claim #16: Persecution, BAWWW!

9/07/2008 | 1:16 AM | Evolved Rationalist

Fundie (actual quote): The act of atheism in defying Christianity proves that it recognizes Christianity as having a true God. There are thousands of religions, cultures, occult, and spiritual practices in this world that are doubtful to be true at all. Still, atheism goes against the presence of God, especially God in Christianity, way more strongly compare to its refutation against other religions in this world? Why is that so? Given an example of a second best student in class who only goes against the best student in class because he only recognizes the ability of the best student, and not the rest of the class, a similar pattern can be observed between Christianity and atheism. However, Christianity has already won through the blood of Jesus on the cross.

This statement makes no sense at all. Atheism is merely a lack of a belief in god/gods, and has nothing to do with specifically going against the Christian religion. Atheists are not defying Christianity or the Christian god, as you can't defy something that you don't believe exists in the first place. If someone does not believe in goblins, does that mean that the person is defying Goblinism? Since Christians do not believe in Shiva, does that mean that Christianity is defying Hinduism, thus recognizing Hinduism as the true religion?

Christians, what makes you think that Christianity is the true religion among the thousands of other religions known or once known to mankind? Are you really sure that your particular god is the one true god, and how do you know for a fact? Would you have been a fundie Christian if you were born in rural Afghanistan?

"When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." ---Stephen Roberts

The assertion that atheists are all out to attack Christianity certainly fuels the pathetic Christian martyr complex, but rest assured that atheists are not going to call for Christians to be burnt at the stake anytime soon. We leave those sort of things to the butthurt theistards who resort to violence because they simply cannot rationally defend their faith.

Now, a Christian might wonder why the atheism-related posts on my blog are mostly (not all) centered around Christianity. The answer has nothing to do with going against the presence of the Christarded imaginary god, but simply due to the fact that Christianity is the religion that I am most familiar with and the one that I tend to come across in everyday life. I do not post about how Zeus does not exist because Zeus-believers are not the ones making shrill attacks on secular values or trying to destroy science and take us all back to the Dark Ages. If you want some examples of atheist resources that dismantle the arguments of other religions, Google has been invented. Use it.

Notice the interesting thing here: The Christard explicitly mentions atheism as a threat to Christianity, and not any other religions or occult practices. Again, the Christian argument can be flipped on its' head to show the muddled contradictions that is often pervasive in fundie Christian reasoning.

As much as it may hurt Christian egos, Christianity is not the only or final threat to rationalism and reason. Christianity is not the only delusional belief system in the world. Christians, there is no need to get on your high horse and feed your persecution complex.

Also, exactly how has Christianity already 'won' through the blood of Jesus? If Christianity has already won, why was the fundie post needed in the first place? Why bother explaining why you picked Christianity over atheism if Christianity has already won, theistarded moron? Why even bother making a point?

tl;dr: The fundie argument is an EPIC FAILure.


Help /r/equested!

9/04/2008 | 10:09 PM | Evolved Rationalist

An Anonymous protester against the Co$ cult is in need of your help.

He is one of those IRL protesters - the people with masks on the street, part of the 'New Anonymous' - that I have long dismissed and made snide remarks about on this site. His name is Gregg, he has been fair gamed by the Co$, and is currently entangled in legal proceedings started by the cult with the intent of ruining his life for daring to make a stand. If the time has come for us to collectively say 'GO GO GO!' and help someone in need, the time is now.

I am expecting all of you to start scratching your heads right about this point. After all I've said here about how absurd 'New Anonymous' is and why I think it is an epic failure, this calls for an explanation. I stand by what I previously posted. I also still think that although the first protest was a win, having protests each month while wearing masks and spouting relatively obscure internet memes on the street isn't going to do much in terms of helping people trapped in the cult or bringing down the cult. Some things are better kept on the internet, and a lot of people who consider themselves part of 'New Anonymous' (the 'newfags', 'protestfags', 'moralfags', etc) don't seem to realize that using these memes IRL among the diversity of the general population only causes confusion and makes them a laughing stock.

More seriously, remember the Magoogate incident where Tory Magoo flipped out over the Thunderdome in Enturbulation and lots of BAWWWWWing and butthurt were to be had? I do lurk on Enturbulation to see what the 'protestfags' are up to even while moderating a Chan on the next tab. (You are allowed to have lulz at my expense after this revelation, of course.)

Side note for the 'New Anons': That is what happens when you try to co-opt a culture (sometimes without actually bothering to learn the true origins of the culture) and try to deny those origins for PR purposes. Doesn't hiding parts of your movement that you think would seem undesirable to the general population remind you of Scientology? The irony!

tl;dr version: I love the idea behind the Anonymous movement to death but I am not a fan of Project Chanology.

That is all. Simple, to the point...and without the drama.

Now that all of the above is out of the way and to make a long story short, I was contacted by a few Anons who alerted me to Gregg's case. As Rebecca at Skepchick was also notified, go over there and read her post about the case before reading on.

He needs your help because we are not going to let the cult get away with this. The cult tried suppressing information on the internet, and the internet responded by leaking their secret documents all over the series of tubes. Now, they are trying to suppress free speech - and we must not let them get away with it. If the Old Anon tactics did it for the Scilons on the internet, New Anon could do it in real life, because nobody should be intimidated out of speaking their minds. How would you feel if it was an atheist protest against religious bigotry when this happened? How would you react? Why should we shut the fuck up just because someone yells 'lawsuit'? How could we let the false charges and obvious injustice in this case slide just like that? Hasn't Mary the Scilon calling the FBI on me given you a glimpse of how low the Scilons are willing to sink?

If you think that I am merely trolling by posting this, let me show you otherwise. Here is a link to Enturbulation - something I have refused to do for a very long time although I have been asked by countless 'protestfags'. As much as the 'moralfaggotry', 'leaderfaggotry', and anti-lulz drama at Enturbulation pisses me off , as much as I realize that I could never fully agree with 'New Anonymous', for all the lulz I have had at the 'newfags', and as much as I think that Chanology should be left to die a natural death, the time has come for me to set my personal feelings aside to help a fellow human being who deserves all the help he can get.

I could never consider myself an Enturb supporter, but I do consider myself a humanist.

To help out: Gregg accepts PayPal at greggatghc[a]gmail[dot]com

At the very least, send him a supportive e-mail and let him know that there are those of us who care, and also to remind him that Anonymous is Legion he is not alone in this fight. He mentioned that he also appreciates just hearing from people, and as I know a lot of readers of this blog are familiar with the Anon culture and know where he is coming from, please, send him some encouragement.

Also, do your best to spread the word.

Tell everyone you know. Stumble it. Digg it. Repost this on your blog and submit your blog instead if you think that this is an act of self-promotion on my part. Do whatever it takes to get the word out.

He deserves nothing less. Remember, for the lulz and for great justice. DO IT.


"Eucalyptus trees grow everywhere!"

9/03/2008 | 10:46 PM | Evolved Rationalist

One of the characteristics of a fucktarded theistard is the ability to make himself/herself sound like a raving, deluded lunatic. The following lulz-inducing excerpts are from an e-mail exchange with a theistard who thinks that eucalyptus trees grow everywhere.

Eucalyptus apparently grows everywhere, folks. Ever think of planting something unique in your backyard, preferably located in the middle of a desert? Now you have the perfect idea, courtesy of a theistarded moron: Eucalyptus trees!

Way to ensure that you land a TV spot, at least.

My simple question was: How did koalas manage to survive for such a long time without fresh eucalyptus leaves while the ark was happily bobbing along?

Eucalyptus is abundant everywhere. Noah could have dried the leaves.
This theistard simply missed the fact that eucalyptus is not abundant everywhere. Koalas need fresh eucalyptus leaves to survive, and even if they somehow managed to survive for a few days without them, we are not talking about a few days in the context of the myth of Noah's Flood. This theistard is either ignorant, deluded, or simply stupid in every way possible.

If that wasn't lulzy enough, look what came next:
Can you name a country without Eucalyptus Tree? There isn’t one. Eucalyptus trees are everywhere.
Yeah, there are eucalyptus trees even in the Sahara desert - in that theistard's imagination.

Morons are a great source of lulz. Even more so when they cannot fucking use Google to check a simple fact before deciding to sound like a complete clueless asswipe.
Koalas can eat other compatible leaves.
Really? Koalas are endangered because eucalyptus trees are being endangered as well. Without hard evidence that shows us that koalas can survive on 'compatible leaves', the theistard is merely blowing hot air.

The theistard then ended his stupid e-mail with the typical fundie evasion tactic:
God could have taken care of everything.
Ah, the famous GODDIDIT cop-out. Isn't that sweet?

How did god do it? How did the ancestors of today's koalas, as well as the rest of Australia's marsupial fauna, manage to swim back home from Mount Ararat in Armenia (where theistards know the Ark landed) after the Flood? Are those koalas supposed to be aquatic koalas now?

[sarcasm] Perhaps through god's awesome power, the continents moved really fast after the flood ended, and just so that all the koala kinds and eucalyptus kinds happened to all be on the area that became Australia? It is a good thing those koala kinds were able to hold on tight with Australia moving so fast. It is also a wonder the eucalyptus kinds did not become uprooted. [/sarcasm]

GODDIDIT is just a theistarded argument from ignorance because there is no way to demonstrate the veracity of the theistarded claims. Practically anything can be justified and any debate stifled by pulling out GODDIDIT. Until theistards stop using this cowardly cop-out, there is no way to have a rational discussion with them.

To the theistard: This is what I call an astronomically epic FAILure of trying to convince someone that your faith is anything more than theistarded stupidity. However, thanks for being yet another source of epic lulz on this blog. I really appreciate it.


In the Bible, women sing songs about godly murder

9/01/2008 | 7:54 PM | Evolved Rationalist

Theistarded Christians often blabber about how reading the Bible makes them feel good about humanity and things they pull out of their asses. Christians also froth about how reading the Bible keeps them close to their invisible sky-god, helps them know the mind of their imaginary friend, and somehow helps them through their daily lives.

Leaving aside the fact that feeling good about believing in something does not make it true by default; let’s take a look at some of the things in this great book that makes millions of people feel better about their lives.

In the Bible, women sing joyful songs about god-endorsed murder. Not only does god endorse, encourage, and participate in murder, people were expected to greet the slaughter of thousands with laughter, joy, and music. All that was apparently standard stuff in the Bible, and Christians don’t seem to be having any trouble with reconciling any of this with the bullshit they spew about a ‘loving god that sent his son to die on a cross, yada, yada…’.

1 Samuel 18:6-7 (KJV) And it came to pass as they came, when David was returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, that the women came out of all cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet king Saul, with tabrets, with joy, and with instruments of musick. And the women answered one another as they played, and said, Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands.
If that wasn’t bad enough, Saul was displeased as the crowd only ascribed thousands of murders to him, not tens of thousands. This was apparently too much for poor Saul to bear.
1 Samuel 18:8-9 And Saul was very wroth, and the saying displeased him; and he said, They have ascribed unto David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed but thousands: and what can he have more but the kingdom? And Saul eyed David from that day and forward.
If you want to feel good about humanity, the Bible is not the first place to look.

Christians, do you actually realize what your Bible actually says? Are you aware of the parts of the Bible that are not cherry-picked by your pastors while preaching to you theistarded flock of sheep? Do you know about the vile things are in the book you so proudly thump? Who are you to rant about the erosion of ‘morality’ when your own holy book clearly states that god endorses the slaughter of thousands, including innocent children? How dare you even claim that we should base our morality on the Bible?

A lot could be said about the indefensible cruelty, violence, and psychopathic mentality we see in the Bible, but all that is obvious to people who have not been brainwashed or deluded into believing in the Christian cult’s pack of lies.

Anyone who believes in this shit is either deluded, ignorant,...or sick.